
Unraveling The Dichotomy Of Constitutional Morality
The debate on Constitutional Morality came to limelight after the Apex Court’s judgment in India Young Lawyers Association v. The State of Kerala[1](popularly known as
The debate on Constitutional Morality came to limelight after the Apex Court’s judgment in India Young Lawyers Association v. The State of Kerala[1](popularly known as
In a world where the only entertainment channel everyone knew was Doordarshan and the whole family shared the same television screen. But with the change
Case Title: Pradeep Tomar and Another V/S State of Uttar Pradesh and Another [Matters under Article 227 No. 4804 of 2020] Recently Allahabad High
Guardians of law, including the judiciary and legal professionals, have become the sufferers of COVID-19 in effectively rendering their functions. The Supreme Court, through its
The outbreak of the pandemic disease, i.e., COVID-19, is primarily a public health concern. However, the crisis’s impact and the legal and administrative responses developed
Decided on : 23 February 1854. Judges : Parke B, Platt B, Alderson B, Martin b Court : Exchequer Court Citation : (1854) EWHC J70,
What is Hate Speech? Any sort of exchange of words in verbal, written, or behavioral structure that assaults or uses the derogatory or unfair language
“All admissible evidence is relevant but all relevant evidence is not admissible”[1] A confession is a statement made by an accused which must either admit
Introduction: President, being the Head of their Republics exercises various prerogative powers during course of their office all over the globe in order to extend
Name of the case : Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose Appellant : Mohori Bibee Respondent : Dharmodas Ghosh Date of the judgement : 4 March
209 sector 13, Hisar, Haryana 125001
+91-9852418878
[email protected]